Social traumatization while the a good predictor from suicidality certainly one of people with PTSD

Social traumatization while the a good predictor from suicidality certainly one of people with PTSD

Table 2 shows that the 76 individuals in the PTSD group were significantly younger and had a higher percentage of females compared to those in the TEHC group. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of years of education. Individuals in the TEHC group reported that they had experienced an average of 1.4 (SE = 0.7) traumatic events, while those in the PTSD group reported experiencing a significantly higher average of 2.2 (SE = 1.3) traumatic events (t = 5.363; p < .001). Among the participants diagnosed with PTSD, 46 belonged to the NIT group, while 30 belonged to the IT group. Among the participants in the NIT group, 28 (60.9%) were female, whereas 26 (86.7%) were female in the IT group, exhibiting a significantly higher ratio than that of the NIT group (? 2 = 5.875, p = .015). The mean age of the IT group (43.4 years) was significantly lower than that of the NIT group (51.4 years; t = 2.417, p = .018). No difference was observed between the two groups in terms of years of education.

Logistic regression was conducted with suicidality as the dependent variable and the diagnosis of PTSD, age, sex, and years of education as independent variables. Individuals in the PTSD group were 7.851 times more likely to have suicidal ideation (95% confidence interval [CI] = [4.725, ]; p < .001), times more likely to plan for suicide (95% CI = [5.671, ]; p < .001) and 9.776 times more likely to attempt suicide (95% CI = [4.512, ]; p < .001) compared to the TEHC group.

The fresh BFI-eleven score was indeed compared within PTSD and you may TEHC communities. This new PTSD classification had a notably lower extraversion (F = 6.78; p = .009) get but highest neuroticism (F = 9.40; p = .002) and you will visibility (F = seven.85; p = .005) results compared to those about TEHC classification. Both groups were not notably more with regards to the agreeableness and you can conscientiousness score. No high http://datingranking.net/cs/mamba-recenze/ differences was present in some of the five proportions of one’s BFI-11 score between your NIT and it communities inside PTSD group.

A good logistic regression try conducted for folks with PTSD, which have suicidality since the mainly based changeable and type away from shock, years, sex, and you may several years of education because the independent parameters to analyze the effect of interpersonal trauma towards the suicidality

Individuals in the It classification was basically step three.643 minutes more likely to enjoys self-destructive ideation (95% CI = [1.226, ]; p = .020) compared to those throughout the NIT group. Likewise, the kind of traumatization didn’t expect people tall change in suicidal believed or take to.

Character issues once the predictors of suicidality certainly people with PTSD

Logistic regressions have been presented to choose if the BFI-11 results predict suicidality when you look at the people with PTSD and pick whether the form of shock had an excellent moderating impact on such as for instance relationships. A total of about three regressions was did; per logistic regression is performed which have sometimes self-destructive ideation, think, otherwise try since founded adjustable and also the millions of new five identity situations, the type of trauma, relationships involving the type of traumatization therefore the five personality factor scores, age, intercourse and you may years of training because the independent details. Among the many four identity activities, conscientiousness forecast straight down self-destructive ideation (chance proportion [OR] = 0.454; 95% CI = [0.163, 0.974]; p = .044) and try (Or = 0.070; 95% CI = [0.011, 0.459]; p = .006). Agreeableness predict lower self-destructive shot (Otherwise = 0.131; 95% CI = [0.031, 0.562]; p = .003) together with a tendency from predicting suicidal ideation (Otherwise = 0.454; 95% CI = [0.201, step 1.027]; p = .058). Lastly, visibility to try out forecast all the way down self-destructive decide to try (Otherwise = 0.193; 95% CI = [0.039, 0.951]; p = .043). More over, tall connections was located between your type of trauma together with conscientiousness rating getting self-destructive ideation and try, between your style of traumatization and you will agreeableness score getting self-destructive ideation and attempt and between the particular trauma and you will transparency score to own suicidal decide to try regarding the PTSD group (Desk step 3).

Posted in: